Software Engineer Resume Optimizer
Software engineer resumes that pass the bots.
Match your resume to the role — React, TypeScript, GCP, Kubernetes, system design, the works. Free ATS score; pay only to download.
What changes in your resume
Same facts. Different read.
Three real-shape rewrites we'd make on a typical software engineer resume. Notice nothing was invented — just sharpened.
Original
“Worked on improving application performance and helped with backend stuff.”
Rewritten
“Reduced p95 API latency 40% by tuning Postgres queries and adding Redis caching to a Node.js service handling 10K req/min.”
Why: Anchors a vague claim in concrete numbers, names the stack the JD asked for, replaces "worked on" with a measurable verb.
Original
“Responsible for the frontend codebase.”
Rewritten
“Owned a React/TypeScript codebase (~50K LOC) serving 200K monthly users; led the TS migration that cut runtime errors 60%.”
Why: Surfaces ownership, scope, and a measurable impact instead of a job-description-style bullet.
Original
“Helped team adopt CI/CD.”
Rewritten
“Drove CI/CD adoption across three teams using GitHub Actions + Docker; cut average deploy time from 25 to 6 minutes.”
Why: Quantifies the change, names the tools, shows cross-team scope.
Common mistakes
The patterns we see most often.
These come up across thousands of rewrites. Each one drops your ATS score by 5–15 points on its own.
- 01
Listing every technology you've ever touched. Recruiters and ATS scoring both deprioritize "skills soup". Lead with the 8–12 you'd defend in an interview.
- 02
Describing what the team did, not what you did. "We migrated to Kubernetes" reads as narration; "Led the K8s migration of 12 services" reads as ownership.
- 03
No system-design context for senior roles. A staff JD scores against scope; if your bullets are all feature-level, the score reflects that.
- 04
Burying the most relevant role. Reorder so the role most similar to the JD is first or most-detailed, even if it isn't the most recent.
Common questions
Software Engineer Resume questions, answered.
Does this work for senior engineering roles?
Yes. The rewrite weighs scope and impact metrics from your resume against the JD's seniority signals — staff and principal JDs that emphasize architectural ownership get matched against your scope, not just keywords.
Will it add tech I don't actually know?
No. The prompt explicitly forbids inventing skills, projects, or metrics. If TypeScript isn't in your resume, it won't appear in the rewrite — but it will appear in the "missing keywords" list so you know what gaps to address.
Is the PDF ATS-readable?
Yes — true vector PDF with selectable text, tested against major ATS parsers. Single-column layout, standard section headings, machine-readable contact line.
Ready
Score yours in thirty seconds.
Free to try. Pay only when you're happy with the rewrite and want the clean PDF.
Try it free →